UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6716
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-262-A)
Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 18, 2000
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lloyd George Maxwell seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion challenging the
district court’s March 21, 1997, denial of his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error in
its determination that Maxwell’s current motion is untimely under
Rule 60(b). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability
and dismiss the appeal on this reasoning of the district court.
See United States v. Maxwell, No. CR-93-262-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 20,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2