United States v. Burnette

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6712 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES HOWARD BURNETTE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-94- 249-K, CA-99-3623-MJG) Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 18, 2000 Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Howard Burnette, Appellant Pro Se. Mythili Raman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Charles Howard Burnette seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) as untimely under the AEDPA. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Burnette, Nos. CR-94-249-K; CA-99-3623-MJG (D. Md. May 11, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED * Although the order from which Burnette appeals was filed on May 10, 2000, it was entered on the district court’s docket sheet on May 11, 2000. May 11, 2000, is therefore the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a); see also Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2