Wright v. Haines

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6732 ROBERT JACK WRIGHT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM S. HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Cor- rectional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, Dis- trict Judge. (CA-99-33-3) Submitted: September 14, 2000 Decided: October 2, 2000 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Jack Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Leah Perry Macia, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Robert Jack Wright appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wright v. Haines, No. CA-99-33-3 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 26, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2