United States v. Fiorani

Filed: October 13, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6465 (CR-98-340-A) United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Defendant - Appellant. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed September 28, 2000, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 3, line 3, and on page 2, line 7 -- the references to “CA-99-200" are deleted. For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6465 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-98-340-A) Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. G. David Hackney, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Fiorani, No. CR-98- 340-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3