UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1327
KENNETH SEATON; MARGARET SEATON, as individ-
uals, d/b/a Hi-Tech Hygiene,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
SCIENTIFIC HYGIENE, INCORPORATED, a Nevada
corporation; KENNETH KROLL; ROBERT WARMINGTON,
Individually,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, West Virginia,
Party in Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden II, Chief
District Judge. (CA-95-127-3)
Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 12, 2000
Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Seaton, Margaret Seaton, Appellants Pro Se. Hugo Nathan
Gerstl, Monterey, California, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth and Margaret Seaton appeal the district court’s orders
entered on February 18, February 28 and March 13, 2000, in their
civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Seaton v. Scientific
Hygiene, Inc., No. CA-95-127-3 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 18 & 28, 2000; Mar.
13, 2000). We deny the Seatons’ motion to stay the district
court’s proceeding and motion for extraordinary relief and the
Appellees’ motions to dismiss and strike the Seatons’ reply brief.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2