UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1502
KEVIN POTTER; MARGUERITE C. POTTER; HARRY H.
POTTER; THEODORE POTTER; DALE M. POTTER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
JAMES MOSTELLER, III; JAMES NANCE; STANLEY
MCGUFFIN; HENDERSON AND SALLEY; BEDINGFIELD &
WILLIAMS; NANCE & MCCANTS; AUGUSTA FIBERGLASS
COATINGS, INC.; CRESTWOOD GOLF CLUB, INCORPO-
RATED; CRESTWOOD PARTNERSHIP; JOHN BOYD; DALE
BRYANT; GEORGE SPRUCE MCCAIN; CLAUDE MCCAIN;
MCCAIN FINANCIAL GROUP, INCORPORATED; RYAN
TIDWELL; CRESTWOOD GOLF CLUB TRUST, INCORPO-
RATED; SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL BANK; WACHOVIA
BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, N.A.; SINKLER & BOYD,
P.A.; EDWARD HAYES; WALTER BRYANT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-98-1158-5-22)
Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Potter, Marguerite C. Potter, Harry H. Potter, Theodore
Potter, Dale M. Potter, Appellants Pro Se. James Donovan
Mosteller, III, BEDINGFIELD LAW OFFICES, Barnwell, South Carolina;
James Drayton Nance, NANCE & MCCANTS, Aiken, South Carolina; Clarke
Wardlaw DuBose, SINKLER & BOYD, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina;
Edward A. Frazier, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying their
Fed. R. Civ.P. 60(b) motion and granting sanctions against them.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Potter v. Mosteller, No. CA-98-1158-5-
22 (D.S.C. Mar. 22 & 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2