United States v. Winfield

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6560 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT LEE WINFIELD, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-95-193, CA-99-294-2) Submitted: December 21, 2000 Decided: January 5, 2001 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Winfield, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Robert Lee Winfield, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Winfield, Nos. CR-95-193; CA-99-294-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2