UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1915
CONRAD N. FREUND,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KENNETH MITAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-98-107-7)
Submitted: November 20, 2000 Decided: January 5, 2001
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel C. Summerlin, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZELGROVE, P.L.C., Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellant. Michaux Raine, III, RAINE & PERDUE,
P.L.C., Rocky Mount, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Mitan appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and entering a civil
judgment against him for $147,056.67. On appeal, Mitan only al-
leges that the district court erred in finding that it had personal
jurisdiction over him; he raises no issues related to the amount or
propriety of the judgment itself. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Freund v. Mitan, No. CA-98-107-7 (W.D. Va. June 7, 1999) (denying
motion to dismiss for reasons as stated from the bench). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2