UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-4425
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ARANDER MATTHEW HUGHES, JR., a/k/a Randy Hughes,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District
Judge. (CR-98-155)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: January 8, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean P. Devereux, SEAN P. DEVEREUX, P.A., Asheville, North Caro-
lina, for Appellant. Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney,
Brian Lee Whisler, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Arander Matthew Hughes, Jr., was convicted of three counts of
robbery in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(1994), two
counts of bank robbery, five counts of use and carry of a firearm,
18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (1994), and two counts of carrying an unreg-
istered short-barreled shotgun, 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) (1994). He was
sentenced to a total of 1120 months imprisonment. We affirm.
On appeal, Hughes argues that: (1)the district court plainly
erred in admitting prior consistent statements of government wit-
nesses; there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions
for unlawful possession of a sawed-off shotgun; and (3) there is
insufficient evidence to support the Hobbs Act convictions in the
absence of the jurisdictional element of an interstate commerce
nexus. We have reviewed the briefs submitted by the parties, and
the material presented in the joint appendix, and find no revers-
ible error.
Accordingly, we affirm Hughes’ convictions and sentences. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2