UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6065
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SAMUEL WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CR-98-411, CA-99-800)
Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Barton Campbell, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-
ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wright’s motion for
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea-
soning of the district court. See United States v. Wright, Nos.
CR-98-411; CA-99-800 (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 2000). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2