United States v. Crosby

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7560 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEFFREY ROY CROSBY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-96-361, CA-99-1835-4) Submitted: March 13, 2001 Decided: March 23, 2001 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Roy Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Chastain Wicker, OF- FICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Roy Crosby seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Crosby, Nos. CR-96-361; CA- 99-1835-4 (D.S.C. Oct. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED * We have confined our review to those issues raised in Ap- pellant’s informal brief, 4th Cir. R. 34(b), and to the extent Appellant seeks to raise claims not first presented to the district court, we decline to review such claims. 2