Scott v. Moore

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7291 STEVEN LAMONT JOEL SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DR. MOORE, Assistant Warden; DEBORAH G. WOOD- SON, Sec/Supervisor; V. JONES; VIRGINIA B. THEISEN; B. HARRIS; D. GRAHAM; ALTON BASKER- VILLE; CAPTAIN ROWLETT; R. BEDWELL; SGT. COLE- MAN; LIEUTENANT THOMAS; W. P. ROGERS; RONALD J. ANGELONE, Defendants - Appellees, and LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden; SERGEANT MILLING; LIEUTENANT GREGORY; SGT. RICHARDSON; CAPTAIN JONES; CAPTAIN ARTIS; MARK L. EARLEY, Attorney General of Virginia, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-00-272-AM) Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 28, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Lamont Joel Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Steven Lamont Joel Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) com- plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Scott v. Moore, No. CA-00-272-AM (E.D. Va. filed July 31, 2000; entered Aug. 2, 2000). We deny Scott’s motion for general relief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * To the extent that the district court held that Scott failed to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101 - 12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 2000), we affirm. We do not express an opinion concerning the constitutionality of the ADA as applied to state prisons. 2