UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1299
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-1300
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Dis-
trict Judge. (MISC-01-16-1, MISC-01-17-1)
Submitted: April 20, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
No. 01-1299 dismissed and No. 01-1300 affirmed by unpublished per
curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals
district court orders denying his motions for leave to file com-
plaints. We have reviewed the records and find no error. Accord-
ingly, in No. 01-1299, we deny Armstrong’s motion for leave to
proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal as friv-
olous. In No. 01-1300, we affirm the district court order on the
reasoning of the district court. See Armstrong v. Osteen, No.
MISC-01-17-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Jan. 25, 2001; entered Jan. 26, 2001).
We deny Armstrong’s motions for summary judgment. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
No. 01-1299 - DISMISSED
No. 01-1300 - AFFIRMED
2