Green v. Mayor and City Coun

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2330 ROBERT E. GREEN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; THE BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; SOD DECOY SQUAD; CARL STAMBAUGH, Officer; OTHER MEMBERS OF THE BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-99- 2941-MJG) Submitted: March 6, 2001 Decided: April 30, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert E. Green, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Gary Charles May, BALTI- MORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland; William Rowe Phelan, Jr., OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITOR, Baltimore, Maryland; Eileen Antoinette Carpenter, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Robert E. Green, Sr., appeals the district court’s order advising him that additional repetitive filings relevant to his closed cases would be discarded without a response. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, No. CA-99-2941-MJG (D. Md. Oct. 2, 2000). We deny Green’s motion to proceed on formal briefs and for appointment of counsel. We note that additional filings by Green regarding this matter, other than a rehearing petition or a petition for writ of certiorari, may result in the imposition of sanctions. We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2