UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7812
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GUY CARMICHAEL CRENSHAW,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-96-47, CA-99-424-7)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 6, 2001
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Guy Carmichael Crenshaw, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Guy Carmichael Crenshaw appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for relief filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
(1994), and his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the rec-
ord and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Crenshaw, Nos. CR-96-47; CA-99-424-7 (W.D.
Va. Nov. 21 & Dec. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2