Oliver v. Fowlkes

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7821 DAN OLIVER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K. FOWLKES, Ombudsman; JOHN TAYLOR, Warden; JOE TEEFEY, Institutional Attorney; H. CLARK, Operational Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-1485-AM) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 6, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dan Oliver, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant At- torney General, Richmond, Virginia; Mark Charles Nanavati, SINNOTT, NUCKOLS & LOGAN, P.C., Midlothian, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Dan Oliver appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the rea- soning of the district court. Oliver v. Fowlkes, No. CA-99-1485-AM (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 28, 2000; entered Nov. 29, 2000). With regard to claims Oliver asserts the district court did not address, we find that those claims lack merit. We deny Oliver’s motions for a certificate of appealability, for appointment of counsel, for extraordinary relief, and for emergency relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2