United States v. McQueen

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6025 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY MCQUEEN, a/k/a Champ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-95-26-BR, CA-98-201-7-BR) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 15, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony McQueen, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Anthony McQueen seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) and his motion for enlargement of time to file a motion for recon- sideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McQueen, Nos. CR-95-26-BR; CA-98-201-7-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2000; Nov. 30, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2