United States v. Reynolds

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6762 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARK ANTHONY REYNOLDS, a/k/a Mark Anthony Fain, a/k/a Mark Anthony Wilson, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CR-98-27, CA-00-65-1) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 18, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Anthony Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Melvin W. Kahle, Jr., United States Attorney, Paul Thomas Camilletti, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Mark Anthony Reynolds seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to recuse the district court judge, his motion for bail, and his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), seeking relief from the court’s judgment denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Reynolds, Nos. CR-98-27; CA-00-65-1 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 23, 2001). We deny Reynolds’ motion for bail and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2