Hammond v. Wilmoth

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7211 KENNETH N. HAMMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM D. WILMOTH, Correctional Officer; H.F. SHIFLETT, Housing Unit Manager, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-1684-AM) Submitted: June 15, 2001 Decided: June 28, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth N. Hammond, Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Kenneth N. Hammond appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his action filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000), for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. See Booth v. Churner, ___ U.S. ___, 69 U.S.L.W. 4387 (U.S. May 29, 2001) (No. 99-1964). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hammond v. Wilmoth, No. CA- 99-1684-AM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 8, 2000; entered Aug. 9, 2000). Because Hammond may refile his action after exhaustion, we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1994). We deny Hammond’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED 2