UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6452
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TONY B. ALEXANDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-6500
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TONY B. ALEXANDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-6571
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TONY B. ALEXANDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 01-6572
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TONY B. ALEXANDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CA-98-106-3-V, CR-95-178-V)
Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: July 31, 2001
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
No. 01-6452 dismissed and Nos. 01-6500, 00-6571, and 00-6572
affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tony B. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
In Appeal Number 01-6452, Tony B. Alexander appeals from the
district court’s order denying his motions for a certificate of
appealability, for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6), for a
ruling on his Rule 60(b)(6) motion and his motion for a certificate
of appealability, and for a rehearing and to supplement his Rule
60(b)(3), (4) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Alexander’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny his motion for
a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Alexander, Nos.
CR-95-178-V; CA-98-106-3-V (W.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2001).
In Appeal Number 01-6500, Alexander appeals from the district
court’s denial of his motion for a downward departure. Appeal
Number 01-6571 is Alexander’s appeal from the district court’s
denial of his motion for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3),
(4), and Number 01-6572 is Alexander’s appeal from the denial of
his emergency motion requesting the issuance of an opinion on his
Rule 60(b)(3), (4) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. According-
ly, we deny Alexander’s motions for appointment of counsel in each
of these appeals and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Alexander, No. CR-95-178 (W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 12,
2001, entered Mar. 13, 2001; entered Mar. 26, 2001; filed Mar. 26,
3
2001, entered Mar. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
No. 01-6452 - DISMISSED
Nos. 01-6500/71/72 - AFFIRMED
4