UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2197
ADA SHERRILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM HENDERSON, Postmaster General,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
99-3405-PJM)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: July 30, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gwendolyn R. Bennett, Suitland, Maryland, for Appellant. Stephen M.
Schenning, United States Attorney, Nadira Clarke, Assistant United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ada Sherrill appeals the district court’s orders granting sum-
mary judgment for the Postmaster General and denying reconsidera-
tion of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. We note
in particular Sherrill suffered no adverse employment action. See
Von Gunten v. Maryland, 243 F.3d 858, 865-66 (4th Cir. 2001); Page
v. Bolger, 645 F.2d 227, 233 (4th Cir. 1981) (en banc). Further,
we find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
Sherrill’s motion for reconsideration. See Collison v. Interna-
tional Chem. Workers Union, 34 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir. 1994).
Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the
district court. See Sherrill v. Henderson, No. CA-99-3405-PJM (D.
Md. July 12 & Aug. 3, 2000). We dispense with oral argument be-
cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2