Richardson-Bey v. Beck

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7005 LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THEODIS BECK; JAMES B. FRENCH; LYNN OEHLING; MARY LOU ROGERS; BONNIE BOYETTE; DENNIS M. ROWLAND; J. BLANGO; F. BROWN, Lieutenant; SERGEANT WATSON; DAVID YATES; SUPERINTENDENT GRIMM; CYNTHIA BUTLER BOSTIC; R. B. LEE, Captain; ELIZABETH LAYCOCK; G. L. WOODARD, Superintendent; C. BATTEN; FRAN MINSHEW; RICK JACKSON, Superintendent; JULIA BRIGMAN; THOMAS J. ANDREWS; MR. WILKERSON; HATTIE B. PIMPONG, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-01-262) Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 14, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leroy Richardson-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Leroy Richardson-Bey appeals the district court’s order deny- ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson-Bey v. Beck, No. CA-01-262 (E.D.N.C. May 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2