Tyler v. Rackley

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6662 LINDA ANN TYLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GLORIA JEAN RACKLEY; EARL RICHARD BAZZLE, Warden at Leath Correctional Institution; CHARLES KEARNEY, JR., Captain; DIANE HAMRICK, Lieutenant; MELISSA WHITT; BERNICE WIGGLETON, Major; BARBARA L. PARTILEDGE, Officer; R. IRBY, Mental Health Counselor; DIANE LITWER, Grievance Coordinator; RANCE COBB, Principal; BETTY FLEMING, Sergeant; V. C. HILL, Lieuten- ant; SANDRA SHUMATE, Operations at Leath Cor- rectional Institution; T. J. PHILSON, Captain; SHERRI CHANDLER, Administrative Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-99-2845-4-24-BF) Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 13, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linda Ann Tyler, Appellant Pro Se. McDonald Patrick Tinsley, Steven Michael Pruit, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Linda Ann Tyler appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tyler v. Rackley, No. CA-99-2845-4-24-BF (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2001). We grant Tyler’s motion to file a response to Appellees’ brief and deny each of her remaining outstanding motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2