United States v. Pacheco

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6736 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RAMON PACHECO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-99-89, CA-01-690-3) Submitted: September 10, 2001 Decided: September 21, 2001 Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ramon Pacheco, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ramon Pacheco seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny- ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Pacheco’s motion to file a supplemental brief, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Pacheco, Nos. CR-99-89; CA-01-690-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2