UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1474
In Re: ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Petitioner - Appellant.
No. 01-1475
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-1476
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UC LENDING CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-1501
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN DOE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen and James A.
Beaty, Jr., District Judges. (MISC-99-71-1, MISC-00-108-1, MISC-
01-26-1, MISC-00-50-1)
No. 01-1610
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KOURY CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee,
2
and
HOLIDAY INN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,
District Judge. (CA-96-87-2)
Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 20, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan A. Berkelhammer,
SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
3
PER CURIAM:
Arthur O. Armstrong has filed notices of appeals in several
district court actions. We have reviewed the records, the relevant
district court orders and find the appeals frivolous. Accordingly,
we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals
as frivolous. We further deny Armstrong’s motions for summary
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
4