UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-4277
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PIERRE DANIELS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
(CR-00-201)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 26, 2001
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert B. Rigney, PROTOGYROU & RIGNEY, P.L.C., Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellant. Kenneth E. Melson, United States Attorney, Joseph
E. DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas Scott
Liverman, Third-Year Law Student, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Following his conviction and sentence for unlawful possession
of a weapon by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g) (West 2000),
Pierre Daniels appeals from the district court’s order denying his
motion to suppress evidence of his possession of a firearm. He
contends that the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to
stop him, and therefore the discovery of the gun was in violation
of the Fourth Amendment. We have reviewed the record on appeal and
the parties’ briefs and find no reversible error. See United
States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 9 (1989). Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order denying Daniels’ motion to suppress. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2