Hale v. Hall

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1412 EARNEST C. HALE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SARAH HALL; SID BELL, Prosecuting Attorney, McDowell County, Welch, West Virginia; CHARLIE SMITH; BILL SADLER; TODD HOUCK; KEVIN WADE; TRACY, LUSK, & ASSOCIATES, Involved; STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-33-5) Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 25, 2001 Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earnest C. Hale, Appellant Pro Se. Ancil Glenn Ramey, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Earnest C. Hale appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hale v. Hall, No. CA-01-33-5 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 7, 2001). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2