In Re: Johnson v.

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6942 In Re: JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR., Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-97-1532) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Johnson, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Joseph Johnson, Jr., filed this mandamus petition requesting that this court direct the district court to amend its judgment to dismiss a civil legal malpractice action without prejudice. Where there is another available remedy, mandamus relief is not avail- able. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is not a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Johnson attempts to use the mandamus petition as a substitute for appeal. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. We deny Johnson’s motion to proceed in forma pau- peris and deny his motion to waive copy requirements as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2