UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1311
AFAF KANAZEH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL K. MANN; PANTONG MANN; LAUREN SHEA;
KENNETH CROSSON; ARLENE L. PRIPETON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION,
Defendant.
No. 01-1354
AFAF KANAZEH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL K. MANN; PANTONG MANN; LAUREN SHEA;
KENNETH CROSSON; ARLENE L. PRIPETON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION,
Defendant.
No. 01-1521
AFAF KANAZEH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL K. MANN; PANTONG MANN; LAUREN SHEA;
KENNETH CROSSON; ARLENE L. PRIPETON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-00-2126-A)
Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 17, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2
Afaf Kanazeh, Appellant Pro Se. Randell Charles Ogg, SHERMAN,
MEEHAN & CURTIN, P.C., Washington, D.C.; Carol Thomas Stone,
JORDAN, COYNE & SAVITS, Fairfax, Virginia; Joseph Francis
Cunningham, CUNNINGHAM & ASSOCIATES, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Afaf Kanazeh appeals from the district court’s orders dis-
missing her eight motions as frivolous and enjoining her from
filing any more pro se lawsuits against defendants. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Kanazeh v. Mann, No. CA-00-2126-A (E.D. Va. filed
Feb. 9, entered Feb. 15; filed Mar. 2, entered Mar. 8; filed Apr.
12, entered Apr. 19, 2001). We deny Kanazeh’s motion for relief.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3