Cordero v. United States District Court of South Carolina

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7463 JOHN CORDERO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CA-01-2368-3-17-BD) Submitted: November 9, 2001 Decided: November 26, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Cordero, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: John Cordero appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), in which he sought to challenge certain orders in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recom- mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Cordero v. United States Dist. Court, No. CA-01-2368-3-17-BD (D.S.C. July 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2