United States v. Adderly

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7102 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LORENZO ADDERLY, a/k/a Son-Son, a/k/a Kendrick A. McKenzie, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-74) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lorenzo Adderly, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Lorenzo Adderly appeals from the district court’s order deny- ing his motion for reconsideration of the order in which the dis- trict court granted Adderly’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, amended his criminal judgment, and reduced his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Adderly, No. CR-95-74 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2001). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2