UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6775
MICHAEL LEE BENNINGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR PATEL; DOCTOR MOORE, Sick Call; MR.
DAVIS, Medical Records; NURSE WHITE, TB Nurse;
NURSE JONES; ROLAND MCFADDEN, Assistant
Warden; LANE CRIBB, Sheriff; MICHAEL SCHWARTZ;
JANE DOE, I, Nurse; JANE DOE, II, Nurse; JOHN
DOE, I, Doctor; JOHN DOE, II, Doctor; JANE
DOE, Doctor; EASTERN HEALTHCARE GROUP, INCOR-
PORATED; CAPTAIN WATKINS; JOHN DOE, Dentist,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-2812-6-13AK, CA-00-3133-6-13AK)
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 5, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Lee Benninger, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr.,
John Eric Fulda, Irmo, South Carolina; Alexia Pittas-Giroux,
STUCKEY LAW OFFICES, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina; Danny
Calvert Crowe, Ronald Hawthorne Barrett, TURNER, PADGET, GRAHAM &
LANEY, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina; William Walter Doar, Jr.,
MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., Georgetown, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael Lee Benninger appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Benninger v. Patel, Nos. CA-00-2812-6-13AK; CA-00-
3133-6-13AK (D.S.C. Apr. 4, 2001). We deny Appellees’ motions to
dismiss the appeal and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2