UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7690
HENRY ALLEN BECKMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CYNTHIA PHILLIPS, Nurse; PATRICIA POWELL;
RHONDA GRAHAM, all in their official and
individual capacities; DONALD SAMPSON, Doctor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-00-1498-7)
Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Allen Beckman, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod,
HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Henry Allen Beckman appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.
Beckman’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended
that relief be denied and advised Beckman that failure to file
timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate
review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
Despite this warning, Beckman failed to object to the magistrate
judge’s recommendation.
The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s
recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the
substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned
that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.
Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v.
Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Beckman has waived appellate review by
failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accord-
ingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2