UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7279
NATHANIEL H. JONES, a/k/a Nathaniel Hampton,
a/k/a Nathaniel Hampton Jones,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-01-69-2-17AJ)
Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel H. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel H. Jones appeals from the district court’s order
denying Jones’ post-judgment motion seeking consolidation of this
action with a mandamus petition Jones filed in this court. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Jones v. South Carolina, No. CA-01-69-2-17AJ
(D.S.C. July 5, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2