UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1929
DENESE DOUGLAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LARRY G. MASSANARI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-1147-4-13BF)
Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hardwick Stuart, Jr., BERRY, QUACKENBUSH & STUART, P.A., Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellant. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant
Attorney General, Scott N. Schools, United States Attorney, John
Berkley Grimball, Assistant United States Attorney, Deana R. Ertl-
Lombardi, Regional Chief Counsel, Michele M. Kelley, Assistant
Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Denese Douglas appeals the district court’s order accepting a
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to uphold the Admin-
istrative Law Judge’s denial of her claims for Social Security dis-
ability benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny disability
benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and
the correct law was applied. 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) (West Supp.
2001); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have
reviewed the briefs, the administrative record, and the district
court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
on the reasoning of the district court and the magistrate judge.
Douglas v. Massanari, No. CA-00-1147-4-13BF (D.S.C. June 21, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2