Staton v. Dodrill

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7834 JAMES STATON, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus D. SCOTT DODRILL, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-111-HC-BR) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 26, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Staton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James Staton, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Staton’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the dis- trict court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on Febru- ary 15, 2001. Staton’s notice of appeal was filed on October 12, 2001. Because Staton failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dis- miss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2