Richardson v. United States District Court

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8052 WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and U.S. SENATE MAJORITY LEADER; STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Plaintiffs, versus UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT; W. CRAIG BROADWATER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-609-2) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 6, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: William Lee Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. United States Dist. Court, No. CA-01-609-2 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2