UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6077
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM SHORTER, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 02-6078
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM SHORTER, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 02-6107
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM SHORTER, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 02-6121
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM SHORTER, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CR-98-192-A)
Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 29, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Shorter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Morris Rudolph Parker,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
William Shorter, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motions for stenographic notes and records relating to
three of his co-conspirators: Lebby, Brown, and Roberts. He also
appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
reconsideration of the court’s Aug. 27, 2001, order denying access
to records. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shorter, No.
CA-98-192-A (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 21, 2001 & entered Dec. 26, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3