UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7926
EUGENE R. DANIELS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICER NEAL; NFN SEWELL; MAJOR RILEY; WARDEN
JOHNSON; NFN MULLENAX; NURSE BEIFIELT; DOCTOR
EDWARDS; NFN MONTGOMERY; D. SBYANT; NFN MAST;
NFN HAMILTON; NURSE CROCKER; NFN WILLIAMS; NFN
MCGREW; BOBO; CAPTAIN MILLER; NFN WADE; NFN
SMITH; NFN ISGRIGG; NFN ULTMAN; MALE NURSE
GREEN; LIEUTENANT HART; NFN KUMINSKY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (CA-99-4084-7)
Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene R. Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Vinton DeVane Lide, VINTON D.
LIDE & ASSOCIATES, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Eugene R. Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Daniels v. Neal, No. CA-99-4084-7 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 19, 2001 &
entered Oct. 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2