UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1010
L. RUTHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
INTERFIRST CAPITAL, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CA-01-554-A)
Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 26, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. John Thorpe Lawrence Richards, Jr.,
TROUT & RICHARDS, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order ruling on his
document filed with the court on September 21, 2001. The order
noted that to the extent the September 21 document was intended to
be a notice of appeal the court acknowledged such receipt. The
court further noted that to the extent the document was intended to
be a notice to appear, it was denied as moot. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Ruther v. Interfirst Capital, Inc., No. CA-01-554-A
(E.D. Va. filed Sept. 25, 2001 & entered Sept. 27, 2001). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2