UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7909
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GEORGE ALBERT DANGERFIELD, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CR-98-
212-AMD, CA-01-1730-AMD)
Submitted: March 15, 2002 Decided: April 1, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Albert Dangerfield, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Philip S.
Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
George Albert Dangerfield, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Dangerfield,
Nos. CR-98-212-AMD, CA-01-1730-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 3, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2