UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2455
CAROLYN B. SANTANA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-00-1110-24RB)
Submitted: April 15, 2002 Decided: April 29, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harriet McBryde Johnson, Charleston, South Carolina; Ronald
Jebaily, JEBAILY GLASS & MEACHAM, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellant. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, J.
Strom Thurmond, United States Attorney, James D. McCoy, III,
Assistant United States Attorney, Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Regional
Chief Counsel, Teresa H. Abbott, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Carolyn Santana appeals the district court's order that, based
upon a report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, upheld the
Administrative Law Judges’s denial of her claim for Supplemental
Security Income benefits and for a period of disability and
disability insurance benefits.
We must uphold the decision to deny disability benefits if the
decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law
was applied. See 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) (West Supp. 2001); Craig v.
Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have thoroughly
reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court and magistrate judge. Santana v. Barnhart, No. CA-
00-1110-24RB (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2