UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6690
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICHARD EARL WILSON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-95-49)
Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 24, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Earl Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Richard Earl Wilson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion in which he challenges the
validity of his sentence after Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466
(2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wilson, No.
CA-95-49 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 28, 2002; entered Mar. 1, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2