Filed: July 23, 2002
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6212
(CR-98-282, CA-00-1192-1)
United States of America,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
Eric Pearson Lee,
Defendant - Appellant.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed April 30, 2002, as follows:
On page 2, lines 2 and 3 of text: The prepositional phrase is
corrected to read “under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).”
For the Court
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6212
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ERIC PEARSON LEE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-98-282, CA-00-1192-1)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Pearson Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Eric Pearson Lee seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001) and denying reconsideration of that order. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Lee, Nos. CR-98-282; CA-00-1192-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov.
27, 2001; Feb. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3