UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6955
LARMARKO S. ROSCOE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General for the
State of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
No. 02-7024
LARMARKO S. ROSCOE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General for the
State of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-01-3168-6-24AK)
Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 30, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larmarko S. Roscoe, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Larmarko S. Roscoe seeks to
appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) and the district
court’s order denying a certificate of appealability. We have
reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district
court that Roscoe has not made a substantial showing of the denial
of a constitutional right. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealabilty and dismiss Roscoe’s appeal of each order. See Roscoe
v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-01-3168-6-24AK
(D.S.C. May 24 & June 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3