UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6510
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHARLES D. HAWKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CR-00-332, CA-02-15-AM)
Submitted: August 26, 2002 Decided: October 8, 2002
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles D. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Hulser, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Charles D. Hawkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(2000).* We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning
of the district court that Hawkins has not made a substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States
v. Hawkins, Nos. CR-00-332; CA-02-15-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2002).
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
*
To the extent that Hawkins has raised new issues on appeal
that were not presented to the district court, those claims are not
properly before this court. Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250
(4th Cir. 1993).
2