Jasper v. Biggerstaff

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM JASPER,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D/S BIGGERSTAFF, Quarter Master  No. 02-6236 East; SERGEANT SPROUSE, Quarter Master West; D/S THOMPSON, Quarter Master West, Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-01-1059-AM) Submitted: September 12, 2002 Decided: October 7, 2002 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. COUNSEL William Jasper, Appellant Pro Se. 2 JASPER v. BIGGERSTAFF Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). OPINION PER CURIAM: William Jasper seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing for failure to state a claim his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly after the expiration of the appeal period. Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), the notice is considered filed as of the date Jas- per properly delivered it to prison officials for mailing to the court. The record does not reveal if or when Jasper complied with the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1). Accordingly, we remand the case for the district court to obtain this information from the parties and determine the timeliness of the filing under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. We deny Jasper’s motions for appointment of counsel and for an extension of time to file an informal brief. REMANDED