Lindsey v. Lee

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6994

JERRY L. LINDSEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

R. C. LEE, Warden; ROBERT TERRY, JR.,
Disciplinary Hearing Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-02-255-5-H)

Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 17, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry L. Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

Jerry L. Lindsey appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint in which he alleged

that he did not receive adequate notice of disciplinary charges

prior to a prison disciplinary hearing. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court that no constitutional rights were

implicated by the alleged lack of adequate notice. See Lindsey v.

Lee, No. CA-02-255-5-H (E.D.N.C. May 23, 2002). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2