UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1790
EDWARD MARTIN MCKENNA, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
R. C. LEE; JIM GODWIN; ANDY ARTOLA; JUDY
CHAPMAN; GEORGE LIPSCOMB; JANICE FAULKNER;
CAROL HOWARD; LYNN PHILLIPS; THEODIS BECK;
JOHN DOES 1-34; 3M COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MICHAEL F. EASLEY; HAL F. ASKINS; JEFFREY R.
EDWARD; MARTIN T. MALTER; DOUGLAS F. MCINTOSH;
MARK A. LEWIS; SUSAN FREYA OLIVE; PETER L.
OLSON; CHARLES BULLOCK; FINESSE COUCH;
REGINALD MEWBORN; J. BAKE WILLIAMS; GREGORY T.
WAH; PATRICK BALLANTINE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-911-BR)
Submitted: November 27, 2002 Decided: December 20, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Martin McKenna, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Neil Clark Dalton,
James Philip Allen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH
CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; James Donald Cowan, Jr., SMITH
MOORE, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina; Shannon R. Joseph, SMITH
MOORE L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Edward Martin McKenna, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Appellees and denying relief on
his copyright infringement action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See McKenna v. Lee, No. CA-00-911-BR
(E.D.N.C. July 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2