UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1353
ROBERT LEE DORSEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, BOARD OF EDUCATION; NEW
HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; JOHN MORRIS,
JR., Superintendent; GEORGE W. HANCE, JR.,
Assistant Superintendent; SAFFO CONTRACTORS,
INCORPORATED; NICOLAS A. SAFFO; PETE VINSON;
WILEY ELLER, SR.; DOES AND ROES 1-25,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-187-7-F(1))
Submitted: November 19, 2002 Decided: December 16, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lee Dorsey, Appellant Pro Se. Wayne Albert Bullard, Stacey
Leigh Fuller, HOGUE, HILL, JONES, NASH & LYNCH, Wilmington, North
Carolina; Ann S. Estridge, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, L.L.P.,
Raleigh, North Carolina; Robert White Johnson, Anna Johnson
Averitt, JOHNSON & LAMBETH, Wilmington, North Carolina; Kenneth
Alexander Soo, Kara L. Grice, THARRINGTON SMITH, L.L.P., Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Dorsey appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for failure to respond to Defendants’
motions to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dorsey v. New
Hanover County, Bd. of Educ., No. CA-01-187-7-F(1) (E.D.N.C. Feb.
22, 2002). Based on this court’s informal briefing order of July
30, 2002, and Dorsey’s compliance with that order, we deny
Appellees’ motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2